Quick-Read Summary (TLDR)

When foreign entities sue Florida companies, they must navigate complex legal requirements. Key considerations include meeting Florida’s long-arm statute and constitutional due process for jurisdiction.

Understanding specific versus general jurisdiction is crucial, as is leveraging contractual jurisdiction under Section 685.102. Foreign entities also face significant discovery obligations, venue selection strategies, and proper service of process. Finally, they must prepare for forum non conveniens challenges and be aware of statutory limitations.

Planning to sue in Florida? Having an experienced Florida legal counsel on your side is essential for successful litigation. An experienced Florida litigation attorney can manage the complexities and represent you in court.

Need Florida legal advice or representation? Reach out to South Florida Law on our contact form or by calling (954) 900-8885

When a foreign entities are intent on suing Florida companies, numerous complex legal considerations come into play. Understanding these factors before filing suit can mean the difference between successful litigation and costly procedural defeats. Here are ten critical considerations that foreign entities must address when planning litigation against Florida companies.

1. Meeting Florida’s Long-Arm Statute Requirements

Florida’s long-arm statute, found in Section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes, serves as the gateway for foreign entities seeking to sue Florida companies. This statute establishes specific jurisdiction through nine enumerated categories of conduct that subject a defendant to Florida court authority. These include operating a business in Florida, committing tortious acts within the state, owning Florida real property, breaching contracts requiring performance in Florida, and several other specified activities.

The statute also provides for general jurisdiction when a defendant engages in “substantial and not isolated activity” within Florida. This higher standard requires continuous and systematic business contacts that mirror those typically found at a corporation’s principal place of business or state of incorporation.

2. Satisfying Constitutional Due Process Requirements

Even when Florida’s long-arm statute applies, foreign entities must still satisfy federal constitutional due process requirements. This involves a two-step analysis established by the Florida Supreme Court. First, the case must fall within one of the long-arm statute’s provisions. Second, the defendant must have sufficient “minimum contacts” with Florida such that maintaining the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.

The due process analysis considers factors including the foreseeability that the defendant’s conduct would result in a Florida lawsuit and whether the defendant purposefully availed itself of Florida’s privileges and protections. Courts also examine whether the forum is reasonable given the parties’ locations and the underlying dispute.

3. Understanding Specific vs. General Jurisdiction

Foreign entities must distinguish between specific and general jurisdiction when planning their litigation strategy. Specific jurisdiction requires that the lawsuit arise from or relate directly to the defendant’s Florida activities. This connection must be substantial, not merely incidental to the claims being asserted.

General jurisdiction, by contrast, allows foreign entities to sue Florida companies for any claims, even those completely unrelated to Florida activities. However, establishing general jurisdiction requires proof that the Florida company’s activities in the state are extensive and pervasive, with significant business operations or revenue derived from established commercial relationships within Florida.

4. Leveraging Contractual Jurisdiction

Foreign entities can establish jurisdiction through contractual means under Florida Statutes Section 685.102, a lesser-known but powerful jurisdictional tool. This statute allows parties to contracts worth at least $250,000 to agree to Florida jurisdiction when they also choose Florida law to govern their agreement.

Unlike the traditional long-arm statute, Section 685.102 provides jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by the U.S. Constitution without requiring the typical minimum contacts analysis. This contractual approach offers foreign entities a more predictable path to Florida jurisdiction, provided their contracts meet the statutory requirements and include appropriate choice-of-law and forum selection provisions.

Florida’s long-arm statute, found in Section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes, serves as the gateway for foreign entities seeking to sue Florida companies. This statute establishes specific jurisdiction through nine enumerated categories of conduct that subject a defendant to Florida court authority. These include operating a business in Florida, committing tortious acts within the state, owning Florida real property, breaching contracts requiring performance in Florida, and several other specified activities.

5. Drafting Effective Forum Selection Clauses

Forum selection clauses can provide foreign entities with crucial litigation advantages, but their effectiveness depends heavily on precise drafting. Courts distinguish between mandatory and permissive forum selection clauses. Mandatory clauses require exclusive litigation in the designated forum, while permissive clauses merely authorize jurisdiction without prohibiting litigation elsewhere.

To ensure a clause is mandatory and enforceable, foreign entities should use language that clearly designates Florida as the exclusive forum. For example, stating that disputes “shall be brought only in Orange County, Florida” is more likely to be considered mandatory than language merely providing that disputes “shall be brought in Orange County, Florida.” The addition of exclusivity language like “only” or “exclusively” strengthens the clause’s enforceability.

6. Managing Discovery Obligations and Deposition Requirements

Foreign entities suing in Florida face significant discovery obligations that can impact litigation costs and strategy. Under Florida law, foreign company plaintiffs must bring their managing agents, officers, directors, and other corporate representatives for depositions in Florida upon notice alone. This requirement exists because having selected Florida as their forum, plaintiffs must be prepared to appear there.

Foreign entities cannot avoid this obligation by claiming inconvenience or demanding that Florida defendants travel abroad or use diplomatic channels for depositions. The rule prevents plaintiffs from gaining unfair advantages by forcing defendants to incur substantial expenses pursuing discovery in foreign jurisdictions. Foreign companies should budget for the costs of bringing key personnel to Florida for depositions and document production.

7. Considering Venue Selection Strategies

Venue selection within Florida requires careful consideration of both practical and legal factors. When contracts specify venue in a particular Florida county, courts have held that litigation may proceed in either state or federal court located in that county, provided both courts have proper jurisdiction.

However, foreign entities should be aware that venue clauses specifying counties without federal courthouses may limit options to state court only. The enforceability of venue provisions can also depend on whether the clause is geographic (specifying a location) or jurisdictional (specifying a particular court system). Strategic venue selection can affect everything from jury pools to applicable procedural rules.

8. Navigating Service of Process Requirements

Proper service of process on Florida corporations requires understanding both state registration requirements and alternative service methods. Florida corporations and registered foreign corporations must be served through their designated registered agents. If the registered agent cannot be served, process may be served on corporate officers including the chair of the board, president, vice presidents, secretary, or treasurer.

For foreign corporations not registered in Florida, service may be accomplished under the long-arm statute or through the Secretary of State as agent for service. Foreign entities should ensure their service methods comply with Florida procedural rules to avoid challenges that could delay or derail their litigation.

9. Preparing for Potential Forum Non Conveniens Challenges

Even when jurisdiction is proper, Florida defendants may challenge the forum as inconvenient through forum non conveniens motions. These challenges examine factors including the location of witnesses and evidence, the relative ease of access to proof, and the enforceability of any eventual judgment.

Foreign entities can strengthen their position by demonstrating strong connections between their claims and Florida, such as where the underlying conduct occurred, where key witnesses are located, or where relevant documents are maintained. Having a mandatory forum selection clause significantly strengthens the foreign entity’s position against forum non conveniens challenges.

10. Understanding Limitations and Exceptions

Foreign entities must be aware of statutory limitations that may affect their litigation strategy. Certain types of contracts may be exempt from forum selection enforcement, and some states have enacted statutes limiting forum selection clauses in specific circumstances, such as construction contracts or consumer agreements.

Additionally, changes in the legal or political environment of a designated forum might affect clause enforceability in extreme circumstances. While courts rarely invalidate forum selection clauses based on changed conditions, foreign entities should monitor significant legal developments in their chosen forum that might impact their litigation rights.

The Importance of a Florida Attorney

Successfully pursuing litigation against Florida companies requires foreign entities to address these jurisdictional, procedural, and strategic considerations before filing suit. Each case presents unique factual circumstances that may affect how these factors apply.

Foreign entities would be wise to not “go it alone.” Seeking guidance from experienced Florida attorneys who understand both the procedural requirements and strategic implications of litigation in the state could be the difference between achieving victory or succumbing to costly failure . Proper planning at the outset can prevent costly procedural challenges and position foreign entities for successful resolution of their disputes with Florida companies.

South Florida Law

Having a successful presence in Florida requires a strong relationship with an experienced legal partner who can represent your company in matters of business litigation. South Florida Law has the resources and experience to work with individuals and companies all over the world who wish to take legal action in Florida. Whether you are a US-based out-of-state resident or represent an entity outside of the United States you can rely on the attorneys of South Florida Law to represent your interests and ensure local compliance. With offices in Broward County and Miami-Dade County, we cover all of South Florida and are licensed to provide legal services throughout the state. Contact us for a consultation on (954) 900-8885 or via our contact form.